Journal review
The chair then notifies the author and editor of the decision. If the dispute solely concerns such differing opinions, the appeal is not considered further and the original editorial decision is upheld. The Journals Board chair discusses the disagreement with both parties to determine whether the dispute involves matters of scientific or technical opinion.
If no resolution is achieved, the author may file an appeal with the chair of the Journals Board. In many cases, author-editor disagreements can be resolved directly through discussions between these parties. They can range from the manuscript not being a good fit for the scope and mission of the journal to which it was submitted, to concerns over the overall quality.Īuthors may disagree with the decision of the editors of ASHA journals and may wish to challenge and appeal those decisions.Īll appeals concerning decisions of an editor are first directed to the editor. There are a number of reasons a manuscript may be rejected for publication in the ASHA Journals. Also, review comments were not structured. This is a change from the previous peer review model in which an editor rendered a decision after two to three reviews were submitted to an associate editor, who made a decision recommendation.
#Journal review free
An editor would be free to recruit additional reviews, such as for specialized statistics review, as needed. The editor, in a decision letter, instead helps the author identify the most important changes, particularly when EBMs or ad hoc reviewers disagree. Upon receipt of reviews, the editor is not expected to provide additional detailed comments. Reviewers submit lists of strengths and weaknesses in a number of categories appropriate for the type of manuscript as well as any brief additional comments. The editor assigns typically two to three reviewers who are editorial board members (EBMs) or one EBM and one ad hoc reviewer, or any combination thereof. In this model, an editor-in-chief (EIC) is responsible for assigning each manuscript to an editor who has the appropriate content expertise. Manuscripts submitted to the ASHA journals go through an editorial board peer review model.